Court greenlights expediting Consensys, SEC lawsuit

A federal decide has permitted a timeline for the court docket to think about the deserves of the lawsuit filed by software program agency Consensys towards the US Securities and Trade Fee (SEC) and its commissioners.

In a July 1 submitting within the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Decide Reed O’Connor established deadlines requiring SEC and Consensys legal professionals to file opening and opposition briefs by September and November, respectively.

Moreover, the decide granted the SEC a 28-day extension to reply to the grievance.


In response to the timeline, all 5 SEC commissioners and the regulator should file their solutions by July 29, with reply briefs due by Nov. 26.

Consensys senior counsel and director of world regulatory issues Invoice Hughes stated in a July 2 social media post that he expects a ruling on the case round December. He harkened to a Christmas track, writing:

“It’s beginning to look a lot like Christmas.”

Consensys filed its lawsuit towards the SEC in April, alleging the regulator was being “unlawful” by attempting to claim management over the “future of crypto” via enforcement actions aimed toward regulating Ethereum (ETH) as a safety.

In June, Consensys reported that the SEC had ended its investigation into ETH. Nevertheless, the SEC subsequently filed its personal lawsuit, alleging that Consensys had been working as an unregistered dealer.

SEC authority

Authorized specialists within the crypto sector are intently monitoring the civil case because of its potential implications for the SEC’s regulatory authority. The watchdog is at the moment engaged in a number of pending lawsuits towards different crypto corporations, together with Coinbase, Binance, and Ripple Labs.

Commissioner Mark Uyeda, additionally named within the Consensys lawsuit, described the SEC’s strategy to crypto regulation as “problematic” in a separate assertion on July 1.

The SEC and Consensys lawsuits had been initiated earlier than the US Supreme Court issued two opinions that might affect how the fee handles enforcement instances. One opinion decided that defendants in SEC civil instances involving securities fraud are entitled to a jury trial, whereas one other requires courts to evaluate whether or not a federal company just like the SEC has acted inside its statutory authority.

The end result of this case might have important ramifications for the regulatory panorama of cryptocurrencies and the SEC’s future enforcement methods.

Talked about on this article

DailyBlockchain.News Admin

Our Mission is to bridge the knowledge gap and foster an informed blockchain community by presenting clear, concise, and reliable information every single day. Join us on this exciting journey into the future of finance, technology, and beyond. Whether you’re a blockchain novice or an enthusiast, is here for you.
Back to top button