High Court action freezes £1.5 million of Craig Wright’s assets amid defamation fallout

The UK High Court has granted Peter McCormack a Worldwide Freezing Order (WFO) towards Craig Wright. This choice, handed down by Mr. Justice Mellor, follows a collection of authorized battles between the 2 events, primarily revolving round Wright’s defamation declare towards McCormack.

The WFO granted to McCormack is meant to stop Wright from dissipating his assets to keep away from paying the substantial authorized prices McCormack incurred whereas defending towards the defamation declare. The order covers a sum of £1.548 million, which incorporates prices already awarded to McCormack and extra bills associated to Wright’s fraudulent conduct through the defamation proceedings.

The defamation declare stemmed from McCormack’s social media posts and a YouTube video through which he accused Wright of fraudulently claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin. In a earlier judgment, the court docket discovered that Wright had offered intentionally false proof and awarded him solely nominal damages of £1 whereas acknowledging that McCormack’s statements had brought about critical hurt to Wright’s fame. The judgment was upheld by the Court of Attraction, which cited Wright’s dishonest conduct through the litigation as a essential consider its choice to award minimal damages.

Justice Mellor’s choice to grant the WFO was influenced by a number of elements, together with Wright’s historical past of defaulting on fee orders and the chance of asset dissipation. The court docket famous that Wright had beforehand transferred shares in his firm to an offshore entity shortly after a judgment towards him, elevating considerations about his intentions to evade monetary liabilities.

This WFO is a component of a broader sample of authorized actions involving Wright, who has been concerned in a number of lawsuits asserting his declare to be Satoshi Nakamoto. In one other latest case, the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) efficiently received its case towards Wright after the court docket discovered overwhelming proof that he’s not the creator of Bitcoin and had solid paperwork to assist his declare.

The High Court’s judgment highlights Wright’s fraudulent conduct’s critical implications and the authorized mechanisms accessible to guard events from the chance of asset dissipation in such circumstances.

Talked about on this article

DailyBlockchain.News Admin

Our Mission is to bridge the knowledge gap and foster an informed blockchain community by presenting clear, concise, and reliable information every single day. Join us on this exciting journey into the future of finance, technology, and beyond. Whether you’re a blockchain novice or an enthusiast, is here for you.
Back to top button